24 Comments

it shocked me

dissapointed

i love SSPX

Expand full comment

Isn’t “ecumenism” the same as coexist of the Marxist/ Zionist? And isn’t that a schism in itself because ecumenism breaks from “Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus” teachings of tradition?

Expand full comment

Thanks Kennedy as always. We need to also send this to Fr Chris as he has not saved souls for certain

Expand full comment

I just listened to Father Chris Alar and was shocked by his talk. I believe that Chris Alar is a spy a plant by the Vatican to combat Traditionalism . He talks like a Traditionist but then condemns those who practice it. I was pleased to see that Kennedy Hall quickly responded to Alars blasphemy. I dropped listening to Alar a couple months back when I got into an argument with him about something and then he called me a schismatic. I lost respect for Chris Alar. Just note that Chris Alar was a regular guy with a college degree in the working world with a girl friend that he dated for several years. More than likely living a sinful life before he became a priest. Chris Alar is not a saint and not an authority of the Church. Dont listen to Chris Alar. Id love for Kennedy Hall to invite Alar to a debate on this subject of Schism. Do it Kennedy!

Expand full comment

Maybe you could send Fr Alar your new book 😉

Expand full comment

I stopped listening to him way back, when I realized he is for the charismatic renewal and medge

Expand full comment

I just watched the Fr Alar video and was saddened. His argument did not impress me… on one hand, he is against the new gay blessings( I’ve seen his video response to the new document) but says SSPX are in schism because they reject the bad parts of V2….by his argument, I guess he’s a material heretic too 🤦🏽‍♀️

Expand full comment

Are some who attend the SSPX or are part of their organisation guilty of the sin of schism? Yes.

Are all of them? No.

Anyone who has a reasonable doubt as to whether post-Vatican II Papal claimants are actually Popes are not guilty of schism. Reasonable doubts nullify any potential guilt.

Expand full comment

what is a conciliarist?

Expand full comment

Great post, I've grown so tired of seeing all these supposedly "traditional" novus ordo priests talk as if they know what Sacred Tradition is while also condemning people and groups who are simply keeping what they have been handed down and not letting it get destroyed and obliterated by modernist.

Expand full comment

Reading Lapide’s commentary for today made me think of your last talk … Lot of Divine Will talk in it.

Expand full comment

Beware brother .. the new darling Priest of the trads is “just” a priest like Father Chris.

Expand full comment

who is this darling Priest you are warning us of?

Expand full comment

f\Because Fr. Alar is closely tied in w ith Faustina and many have text online about not being enamored with her nor her writing because they are closely written by another Sr. Maria Kowalska. My own thought is that Faustina had a problem and it wasn't phsical. For her to think of herself as a saint. Nope

Expand full comment

But how do you know you are right and Fr Alar is wrong?

Expand full comment

If he supports the Charismatic Renewal and Medj… I question his judgment…..

Expand full comment

Research it, that is what I am doing. Start with Marcel's book, "Open Letter to Confused Catholics." Go to the SSPX youtube channel and listen to their SSPX history which expounds a lil more. Read the documents that Levefbre mentions in his book. I don't go to SSPX. I attend a TLM at my church. I thank God we have it and the only reason we TLM at all is because of Lefebvre. I owe Lefebvre the benefit of the doubt over what I am being told therefore I am doing my research. If they ever suppress the TLM, I will go to ICKSP, then FSSP, if those are ever suppressed then SSPX bc of what I have read so far. In the end, it's your decision to make.

Expand full comment

"Deeper study" has given us Amoris Laetitia, Fiducia Supplicans, and a host of other evils.

Expand full comment

I don’t listen to Mawsdley, his thoughts are disturbing. 🙏🏼

Expand full comment

Fr. Mawdsley refused the rules for going to mass because of Covid.

Expand full comment

He had mentioned in his YouTube channel he left so that he could complain and attack his superiors.

Expand full comment

So is he still a priest that can validly give the sacraments by being disobedient to his bishop?

Expand full comment

Wait, didn’t Mawsdley leave the SSPX? I may be wrong….

Expand full comment

Fr. Mawdsley was never in the SSPX. He was FSSP. He left because he refused to degrade the Mass by the COVID mandates.

Expand full comment